By Bronte Price
Most learning and development professionals can picture it immediately.
Disengagement is often framed as a learner problem - a lack of interest, confidence, or effort. But what if disengagement is better understood as a signal, rather than a flaw? A piece of feedback about how safe, accessible, or navigable a learning experience feels.
For LGBTIQA+ learners in particular, disengagement often appears earlier and more subtly. Where inclusion is fragile, disengagement shows up first. In this sense, LGBTIQA+ learners can act as a “canary in the coal mine” for broader learner experience issues, revealing design assumptions that affect many others, too.
Much adult learning design is built on assumptions that are rarely made explicit. These assumptions often work well for some learners, and quietly disadvantage others. Common assumptions include:
For LGBTIQA+ learners, these assumptions can carry additional risk. Visibility is not always neutral. Personal examples can invite disclosure that feels unsafe. Language that seems “standard” may be heteronormative or binary. Silence may be a form of protection rather than withdrawal.
These assumptions advantage learners who already feel culturally safe and aligned with dominant norms. For others, they increase cognitive load and emotional labour - energy spent assessing risk rather than absorbing content.
Crucially, these assumptions are rarely named or interrogated by trainers. They sit invisibly beneath the design, shaping who can participate easily and who must work harder just to stay present.
Consider this scenario.
An LGBTIQA+ learner remains quiet during discussions that involve leadership identity, personal values, or “bringing your whole self to work”. They listen attentively, but rarely speak or offer input.
What is often assumed is low engagement or confidence.
What may actually be happening is ongoing risk assessment. The learner is scanning the room - or the online space - for cues about safety. Past experiences of being judged, stereotyped, or required to educate others inform present behaviour. Silence becomes a strategy, not a deficit.
Inclusive learning design recognises this and responds accordingly. Effective responses include offering multiple modes of participation (chat, written reflection, small groups), making personal disclosure explicitly opt-in, giving permission to observe rather than contribute verbally, and normalising listening as a valid form of learning.
When silence is reframed as data rather than disinterest, design choices shift.
In another common scenario, training content relies heavily on heteronormative examples, binary language, or unexamined assumptions about relationships and family structures.
The impact on LGBTIQA+ learners is often subtle but cumulative. Cognitive load increases as learners translate examples to fit their own lives. Attention shifts from learning to self-monitoring. Disengagement appears quietly - not as disruption, but as reduced energy and participation levels.
Inclusive design doesn’t require spotlighting individuals or calling out difference. Instead, it means the use of broader examples, neutral or varied language, and the recognition of difference as a baseline. This reduces the need for learners to mentally edit content before they can engage with it.
Psychological safety - the belief that one can speak up, ask questions, or make mistakes without negative consequences - is now well established as crucial to learning and performance. Research by Amy Edmondson shows that psychological safety supports participation, learning, and innovation.
What is less often acknowledged is that psychological safety is experienced, not declared - and it is not evenly distributed across learners.
For LGBTIQA+ people, experiences of minority stress - the cumulative impact of stigma, discrimination, and vigilance - mean that safety is often assessed continuously. Learning environments can either reduce this load or amplify it.
Design choices matter. They influence whether learners can direct energy towards learning or must divert it towards self-protection. These dynamics directly affect participation, retention of learning, and the likelihood that new skills will be applied in practice.
A common concern among trainers is that inclusive design might dilute rigour or centre one group at the expense of others. In practice, the opposite is true.
Inclusive design improves clarity, engagement, and confidence across cohorts. It makes expectations explicit, reduces unnecessary cognitive load, and offers multiple entry points into learning.
Designing with LGBTIQA+ learners in mind often strengthens the learning experience for everyone, including introverted learners, culturally diverse participants, and those with varied learning preferences. Inclusion, in this sense, is not a special accommodation. It is good design discipline.
Inclusive design doesn’t require perfection. It requires reflection.
Before delivery:
During delivery:
After delivery:
These questions help trainers interpret learner behaviour with greater nuance and adjust design choices accordingly.
Inclusive learning design is not about getting everything right. It is about recognising complexity, questioning assumptions, and responding thoughtfully to what learners are telling us, sometimes without words.
For experienced L&D professionals, this reflective approach is a marker of professional maturity. It moves the focus from fixing learners to refining design.
When learning design works for those who carry the most risk in a room, it almost always works better for everyone else.
Why not try one of AITD's courses:
Neuroscience for Learning Design and Delivery: This program provides essential knowledge of the brain’s role in learning and offers a strong practical focus to translate the latest neuroscience into the design and delivery of effective learning experiences. By distilling the latest neuroscience across five core areas of learning design and delivery, the NeuroEMBEDTM Framework helps L&D practitioners to create programs that embed knowledge into memory and behaviours into habits. REGISTER NOW.
Emotional Intelligence at Work: The demand for more effective and compassionate behaviour will increase sixfold over the next three years. Now is the time to deepen your capacity to assess and develop this critical workplace capability by taking this successful, engaging program, designed by Genos International - the market leader in emotional intelligence. Takeaways include how to determine which models and measures of emotional intelligence work best within different learning contexts. Additionally, learners will practice various emotional intelligence development exercises and will discover how to design and deliver engaging emotional intelligence development sessions for group learning. REGISTER NOW.
Bronte Price (he, him) is a cis gay man. His career was as a senior public servant in the areas of economic development and regional development. Bronte is an authorised marriage celebrant and has conducted over 200 LGBTIQA+ marriages, more than any celebrant in Australia. In 2016, he established The Equality Network to work with organisations to increase their LGBTIQA+ inclusivity. This collaboration consists of two parts: as a qualified trainer, Bronte provides customised LGBTIQA+ inclusion training to staff; and he works as a consultant to identify areas where an organisation’s LGBTIQA+ inclusivity could be improved. He then partners with the organisation in a series of 90 day ‘sprints’ to ensure genuine progress is made, tracked and reported on. For more information, visit: https://theequalitynetwork.com.au/